Rolling Stones* – Let It Bleed
Label: |
London Records – 8584-1 |
---|---|
Format: |
|
Country: |
US |
Released: |
|
Genre: |
Rock |
Style: |
Rock & Roll |
Tracklist
A1 | Gimme Shelter | 4:30 | |
A2 | Love In Vain | 4:19 | |
A3 | Country Honk | 3:07 | |
A4 | Live With Me | 3:33 | |
A5 | Let It Bleed | 5:28 | |
B1 | Midnight Rambler | 6:52 | |
B2 | You Got The Silver | 2:50 | |
B3 | Monkey Man | 4:11 | |
B4 | You Can't Always Get What You Want | 7:28 |
Companies, etc.
- Phonographic Copyright ℗ – ABKCO Music And Records, Inc.
- Copyright © – ABKCO Music And Records, Inc.
- Manufactured By – ABKCO Music And Records, Inc.
- Published By – ABKCO Music, Inc.
- Published By – Handle Bar Music
- Mastered At – Gateway Mastering
- Lacquer Cut At – Abbey Road Studios
Credits
- Coordinator [Sales & Marketing] – Marisa Mignatti
- Design [Cover & Liner] – Robert Brownjohn
- Engineer [Also] – George Chiantz alias "Irish O'Duffy"*
- Engineer [Assistant] – Jerry Hansen
- Engineer [Chief Engineer] – Glyn Johns
- Lacquer Cut By – Sean Magee
- Legal [Licensing] – Keibu Morton
- Management [Business Affairs], Legal [Legal Affairs] – William Pittenger
- Mastered By – Bob Ludwig
- Photography By – Don McAllester
- Producer – Jimmy Miller
- Producer [Restoration Producer] – Teri Landi
- Product Manager – Dina Kanner
- Promotion [Sales & Marketing] – Julian Klein (3)
- Sleeve – Victor Kahn (2)
- Written-By – Mick Jagger & Keith Richards* (tracks: A1, A3 to B4)
Notes
Includes printed inner sleeve containing credits.
Barcode and Other Identifiers
- Barcode (Text): 018771858416
- Matrix / Runout (Side A runout, etched): 7185791 A
- Matrix / Runout (Side B runout, etched): 7185791 B
- Rights Society: BMI
Other Versions (5 of 469)
View AllTitle (Format) | Label | Cat# | Country | Year | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recently Edited
|
Let It Bleed (LP, Album, Terre Haute Pressing) | London Records | NPS-4 | US | 1969 | ||
Let It Bleed (LP, Album, Stereo, Royal Sound Labels) | Decca | SLK 16 640-P, SLK 16 640 P | 1969 | ||||
Recently Edited
|
Let It Bleed (LP, Album, Stereo, Unboxed Labels) | Decca | SKL 5025, SKL. 5025 | UK | 1969 | ||
Recently Edited
|
Let It Bleed (LP, Album, Stereo) | Decca | SKLM 5025, SKLM.5025 | New Zealand | 1969 | ||
Recently Edited
|
Let It Bleed (LP, Album, Mono) | Decca | LK 5025 | UK | 1969 |
Recommendations
-
-
2016 USA & CanadaLP, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Stereo
-
2014 USLP, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Repress, Stereo
-
2016 USLP, Compilation, Reissue, Remastered, Stereo
-
2020 USA & EuropeLP, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Stereo
-
2016 WorldwideLP, Album, Reissue, Remastered, Repress, Stereo
-
-
-
-
Reviews
-
With all due respect to those that are displeased with this release, I am astounded by it. My copy is dead quiet and perfectly flat, with the sharp edge mentioned below. I clean every new album with an ultrasonic record cleaning machine, so I can't comment on it being dirty coming from the factory.
I don't know why, but the acoustic guitars sound exquisite. The sound-staging throughout is brilliant. In fact, I use this album to demo my analogue gear, as I compare it to a terrible CD master and a 192/24 hi-rez version (maybe the same remaster?). Love in Vain seals the deal for everyone who hears it, as the imaging is unbelievable. -
My copy has a good amount of surface noise and the mix is pretty terrible. The hearing impaired should refrain from remastering duties. Not all of us are listening on low quality single speaker Bluetooth setups. This is just a terrible disappointment.
-
Edited one month agoSo the good points , Guitars , Drums and most of the instruments sound good . My pressing is dead silent , no pops skips .
The Bad - Mick is low in the Mix
I just got the US 1978 reissue - it sounds better then this pressing .
-
-
I own the 2005 CD remaster and was hoping for a version of that. Not too much to ask for given that this is the 50th anniversary edition. Seriously, don’t waste your money.
-
The album is near perfect, but the pressing (pretty noisy even after a thorough cleanup) and mastering (mostly due to compression) could be a lot better.
-
pretty compressed- could sound way better yeah not anywhere good as it could be if the tapes are good
-
Edited 2 years agoJust plain sh*tty sounding. Come on, this is what they did for the 50th anniversary? A disgrace. Flat mix. Where is Mick? The next room? Instruments sound like they rubbed sandpaper on them, warapped them in foam rubber and covered them in a sheet. Avoid at any price. Unless you want to hear what AM radio used to sound like. Under a blanket.
-
Just listened to both sides and was very pleased compared to what I thought was an awful 2020 pressing of Sticky Fingers(couldn't finish side 1). I'd give it a 4 out of 5
-
Release
See all versions
New Submission
New Submission
For sale on Discogs
Sell a copy
48 copies from $12.99